
How will the IHT charge on pensions impact you?
It has now been confirmed that an Inheritance Tax (IHT) charge will be applied to pensions on death from April 2027.
One way to do this is to use life insurance, funded by pension income, to create a lump sum for beneficiaries on death.
Life insurance is a contract between an insurance company and a policyholder. In exchange for a premium, the insurance company agrees to pay out, usually in the form of a lump sum, following the policyholder's death.
Pairing life insurance and pensions can be an effective way to manage Inheritance Tax (IHT) liabilities. This can be structured as follows:
This individual effectively converts their £1m pension fund, which will suffer IHT and Income Tax under the new rules, into a £1.514m lump sum for their beneficiaries.
Working on the basis that the £1m pension fund would suffer IHT at 40% and Income Tax at 20% in the hands of the beneficiaries, the net value of the £1m pension is £480k. Naturally the net value could be worse than this if their beneficiaries are higher rate taxpayers and/or the pension fund would lead to the loss of some RNRB on death.
This type of planning effectively converts £480k into £1.514m for the beneficiaries.
Naturally, this sounds quite attractive - perhaps too good to be true - but this planning effectively ties up capital for an unknown period (the rest of life) therefore the £1m is not achieving investment growth during that period. As such, you must consider what the effective annualised return is and how this changes the longer you live:
Note – the figures used in the above example are taken from annuity and Whole of Life insurance research undertaken in January 2025. All quotes are obtained on standard underwriting terms.
The above represents the most straightforward way to match pension funds with life insurance. However, there are several other potential strategies:
Instead of handing over a pension fund to an annuity provider, individuals could choose to retain the pension fund and pay the insurance premiums via income drawdown. They will retain full control and access to the pension funds, but there is significant risk with this strategy. If a required level of investment growth is not achieved with the pension funds, the fund could be fully depleted before death and jeopardise the ability to continue paying the insurance premiums.
Individuals may now choose to rely on their pension funds for their needs and gift away other assets to help mitigate their IHT liability. Pension funds could be used to fund short-term life insurance contracts (typically seven-year term policies) to protect against the risk of dying after making such larger gifts. Shorter-term annuity contracts could be used here to fund the associated premiums.
This shorter-term planning may work well for business and land owners considering significant gifts in light of changes to Business Relief (BR) and Agricultural Property Relief (APR).
When considering life insurance and annuity options, health is key. Better health usually means more affordable insurance. However, those in ill health can still use this planning. While insurance may cost more, a medically underwritten annuity often provides higher income, potentially covering the extra cost.
If insurance isn't available due to significant health issues, other IHT planning routes will need to be considered.
Insurance can play a key role in transferring wealth to future generations however this planning is best for those who do not need to use their pension assets. If you rely on your pension, this may planning not be suitable.
Furthermore, other options such as drawing income and gifting it under the Gifts out of Surplus Income exemption (Normal Expenditure Gifting), may be more attractive for those who want their beneficiaries to enjoy the funds in the shorter term.
Our award-winning private client team combines the expertise of independent financial planners with specialist tax advisers, leaving them uniquely positioned to cover all elements of this complex pension and IHT regimes.