FS regulatory affairs newsletter – Q4 2023
In this instalment of the FS regulatory affairs newsletter, our experts present their analysis of regulatory developments of the fourth quarter of 2023.
Digital assets - Q4 2023
In the UK, regulatory bodies have continued to zero in on a range of aspects covered by the proposed future financial services regime for cryptoassets. Meanwhile, in Europe, a complex consultation process around the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) is well underway ahead of fast-approaching implementation deadlines. In December, UK Finance published a piece centred on the need for future iterations of crypto technologies to place a greater emphasis on a ‘humanised’ end-user experience. Presently, blockchain interactions can have high technical barriers to entry and understanding, while the anonymised nature of crypto transactions can invite risk, intimidate prospective customers, and reduce perceived accountability. The article convincingly argues that by leveraging existing ‘Mobile Identity’ technology, crypto products could be humanised, increasing adoption. As the industry considers matters of consumer engagement, regulators in the UK and across Europe continue to outline the terms upon which firms engaging with Decentralised Finance (DeFi) can operate. His Majesty’s Treasury (HMT)We previously provided a detailed breakdown of HMT’s consultation into a ‘Future financial services regulatory regime for cryptoassets’ in the Q1 edition of our newsletter. This consultation closed in April, and on 30 October 2023, HMT provided a detailed response to the consultation. In the first chapter, HMT provides a high-level summary of the 131 responses, drawing out key themes and points of clarification which are then addressed sequentially in the following nine chapters. The final three chapters of the response are calls for further evidence relating to three topics:
In November, HMT published a joint statement with several other governments regarding the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF). The commitment of OECD members to this international tax transparency standard demonstrates a collective desire to implement the Common Reporting Standard to ensure that digital assets do not become a cross-jurisdiction vehicle for tax evasion. |
What management should considerHMT have reiterated their commitment to the creation of a prudent but flexible regulatory environment that facilitates innovation, but also protects stakeholders and maintains financial stability. For UK-based firms operating in or adjacent to the digital assets space, the increased scrutiny of regulators over the past 12 months should signal regulatory horizon scanning as a key priority for 2024. The UK Government’s commitment to the CARF will result in significant changes to the disclosure of digital asset holdings in the context of individual and business tax, placing an even greater emphasis on management’s awareness of developments in the space. |
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)In the Q2 2023 edition of our newsletter, we provided a summary of CP22/2 ‘Strengthening our financial promotion rules for high-risk investments, including cryptoassets’. Further to this, in our Q3 edition, we discussed PS23/6, which featured the regulator’s assessment of responses, outlined minor changes and clarifications, and set a final implementation date for firms of 8 January 2024. Ahead of this, the FCA published its ‘Finalised non-handbook guidance on cryptoasset financial promotions’ (FG23/3) on 2 November 2023. This guidance provides a more practical analysis of the regulations to aid firms in adapting policy, procedure, and governance arrangements to enable compliant promotions. On 6 November 2023, the FCA published DP23/4 ‘Regulating cryptoassets Phase 1: Stablecoins’. This discussion paper intends to provide stakeholders with context on how the FCA intends to support The Treasury in developing a regime of fiat-backed stablecoins in the UK. Additionally, the paper describes how the proposed legislative change will shape the UK’s financial services regulatory regime for cryptoassets. The deadline for firms to provide feedback on these matters is 6 February 2024. |
What management should considerImplementation of the rules on cryptoasset promotions should now be complete for all relevant FCA-registered firms. For firms seeking FCA registration, the promotion regulations should be evaluated at the board level, as an external hire may be needed to comply with the ‘authorised representative’ requirement. With regards to DP23/4, it may be useful for management to examine the restrictions and classifications of stablecoins found in Europe’s MiCAR and consider the possibilities for future UK regulation. |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and The European Banking Authority (EBA)In June 2023, MiCAR was passed into law by the European Union. This wide-ranging piece of legislation is subject to two implementation deadlines depending on the nature of a cryptoasset firm’s operation:
Before these implementation deadlines, three ‘Consultation Packages’ are being published by European regulators to ensure that relevant stakeholders can provide input on draft MiCAR Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) and Implementing Technical Standards (ITS). On 5 October 2023, the ESMA outlined seven areas of focus for the second consultation package:
The deadline for responses to the second package was 14 December 2023. The ESMA has suggested that it will publish a third consultation package covering at some point in Q1 2024. The third and final package will focus on themes associated with the December 2024 implementation deadline, including market abuse and investor protection. |
What management should considerAlthough there is an ongoing debate about how beneficial MiCAR may or may not be for innovation within the European digital assets landscape, implementation is rapidly approaching. For EU-associated firms with holdings or interactions with stablecoins, preparations for the July implementation deadline should already be in motion. For currently out-of-scope firms, management should still pay close attention to the consultation process, as developments may impact counterparties or lead to additional firms being brought into the framework. |
If you would like to speak with a member of our team, please click the button below.
This website uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are necessary, while others help us analyse our traffic, serve advertising and deliver customised experiences for you.
For more information on the cookies we use, please refer to our Privacy Policy.
This website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Analytical cookies help us enhance our website by collecting information on its usage.
We use marketing cookies to increase the relevancy of our advertising campaigns.