Rebuilding credit card profitability post COVID-19

Intelligent cost management

With customers in distress revenue levers are going to be hard to pull, so cost management strategies will need to come to the forefront. No doubt tough decisions will need to be made, however care should be taken not to cut too deep and damage future prospects. Wherever possible sustainable efficiency savings should be prioritised over blunt “quick-fix” cuts in areas such as staffing and marketing. 

Let’s be clear; efficiency savings are harder to achieve than quick-fix cuts, and may require expert advice.  The upside is that they make the organisation fitter, more competitive and more robust on an ongoing basis. They are “no-regret” actions.

So how can these savings be obtained? Here we’ll focus on two of the industry’s largest variable cost lines:

• Reward program costs.
• Card scheme fees.

Rewards program costs

Points based reward programs are an important part of the overall credit card proposition. They are used to attract/retain customers and also to incentivise spend. Cost-reduction efforts in this area typically focus on reducing earn rates or increasing the number of points needed to redeem rewards. Whilst both aspects do need to be properly calibrated, these adjustments represent dis-investment in the customer proposition and risk a negative impact in the longer term.

Efficiency gains should be prioritised ahead of cuts and can be achieved in several areas including:

• Better aligning reward program economics with underlying financial drivers.
• Better targeting of incentives and offers.
• Reducing customer gaming and other value destructive behaviour.
• Conducting cost-assurance and optimisation exercises on program/system set-up

A well-executed efficiency program can often reduce cost by 10-15% without impacting the customer proposition or market competitiveness. The chart below illustrates the sources of cost savings from a recent engagement with a major card issuer where savings worth circa 13% of total reward costs were identified. 

Card scheme fees

Every time a credit, debit or prepaid card is used both the issuing bank and the acquiring bank pay a small fee to the card scheme with which the card is associated (typically Visa or Mastercard). With huge numbers of transactions these fees quickly mount up to significant values and it is no surprise that both Visa and Mastercard are highly profitable organisations. So, what can be done to contain or reduce these costs?

Leading banks in North America, Europe and Australia have taken steps to reduce these costs and have achieved significant savings. In general, Asian and African banks have not been as active in managing this aspect of their businesses, so what can they learn from their Western counterparts?

Generally, the banks that have made progress in this area have focused on the following: 

1. Understand what you are paying for and identify quick-win savings.  This is an area where expert help and forensic analysis can be invaluable. Billing arrangements are highly complex and often poorly understood. Typically, clients find out that they are paying for services they do not need or are shocked when they understand how much they are paying for certain items. Addressing these issues can create immediate savings. 
2. Create an organisational centre-of-excellence. Scheme fees are paid by multiple business units including credit cards, current/transactional accounts and merchant acquiring. They also span consumer and business segments and may span multiple geographies. Pulling specific responsibilities into a single centre-of-excellence allows greater understanding and control – the first step to better management.
3. Negotiate improved terms. The largest savings have been achieved by banks negotiating enhanced terms with the card schemes. Negotiated outcomes can be improved through a series of steps:
   • Obtain an expert-level understanding of financial drivers and potential outcomes.
   • Align the organisation across divisions and geographies.
   • Put in place a structured procurement process.
   • Be willing to enter into win-win agreements that offer value to both parties.

Summary

In summary, issuers can act now to increase cost efficiency in ways that do not involve reducing staffing levels. Doing so is a “no-regret” action and should be considered before reducing investment in growth or customer service initiatives. Both areas are highly technical and obtaining expert advice, especially at the start of an initiative is likely to yield better results so we recommend to speak with your usual Mazars advisor, or contact one of our specialists below:

Published: 27/04/2020

All rights reserved. This publication in whole or in part may not be reproduced, distributed or used in any manner whatsoever without the express prior and written consent of the Mazars, except for the use of brief quotations in the press, in social media or in another communication tool, as long as Mazars and the source of the publication are duly mentioned. In all cases, Mazars’ intellectual property rights are protected and the Mazars Group shall not be liable for any use of this publication by third parties, either with or without Mazars’ prior authorisation. Also please note that this publication is intended to provide a general summary and should not be relied upon as a substitute for personal advice. Content is accurate as at the date published.